Mariners: Will Nathan Karns for Jarrod Dyson Pay Off?

Sep 29, 2016; Kansas City, MO, USA; Kansas City Royals center fielder Jarrod Dyson (1) celebrates after a one run single in the ninth inning against the Minnesota Twins at Kauffman Stadium. Minnesota won 7-6. Mandatory Credit: Denny Medley-USA TODAY Sports
Sep 29, 2016; Kansas City, MO, USA; Kansas City Royals center fielder Jarrod Dyson (1) celebrates after a one run single in the ninth inning against the Minnesota Twins at Kauffman Stadium. Minnesota won 7-6. Mandatory Credit: Denny Medley-USA TODAY Sports /
facebooktwitterreddit

The Mariners flipped starting pitcher Nathan Karns for Kansas City outfielder Jarrod Dyson last week. What can Dyson bring to the Mariners in 2017?

It’s not easy to quantify how Jarrod Dyson helped the Royals last year without delving into advanced statistics telling you how he could help the Mariners as well. If you’re a baseball nerd like me and you’re looking at Dyson’s Fangraphs page, let me direct you to a few key stats: First, advanced fielding. According to Fangraphs, Dyson had 19 Defensive Runs Saved (DRS) and posted a 16.7 Ultimate Zone Rating, which projected to a 24.8 rating per 150 innings. That’s exceptional for only playing 107 games last year.

(Here’s what UZR means, and how DRS is calculated.)

Second, Plate Discipline. These numbers likely caught Mariners General Manager Jerry Dipoto‘s eye. Dyson controlled the strikezone well for the Royals last year. He took a hack at only 23.9% of the pitches he saw outside the zone and swung at 66.6% of the pitches he saw inside the strike zone (when you’re supposed to swing). Of those swings he took at strikes, he made contact 93.4% of the time. It’s difficult to throw this guy a strike and create a swing-and-miss. In fact, only 5.1% of the strikes he saw were swinging. Pretty good for a team that has pledged to control the zone.

More from Emerald City Swagger

Third, a by-product of Jarrod Dyson’s plate discipline: a Royals team-high on-base percentage last year of .340. In 107 games played and 337 plate appearances, Dyson slashed .278/.340/.388 and stole 30 bases. He’s a savvy baserunner (which you can see quantified on his Fangraphs page or on Baseball-Reference.com) and a fast outfielder.

But there is some risk involved in the Mariners’ trade. Karns had a down year last season. His 5.15 ERA got him sent to the bullpen, but his Fielding-Independent Pitching (FIP) was a full run below his ERA at 4.05. He struck out better than a batter per inning (9.6 K/9) but issued 45 walks in only 94.1 innings. It’s possible the Mariners viewed him as a bullpen depth piece this offseason and Royals see him as a club-controlled starter. If you’re like my co-editor Paul Taylor and me, you’re not convinced that Yovani Gallardo can be a solid starter all year, so trading a potentially decent starter like Karns (who posted a 3.67 ERA with Tampa Bay in 2015) is a head-scratcher.

Mariners
Sep 6, 2016; Minneapolis, MN, USA; Kansas City Royals outfielder Jarrod Dyson (1) dives back to first in the sixth inning against the Minnesota Twins at Target Field. The Kansas City Royals beat the Minnesota Twins 10-3. Mandatory Credit: Brad Rempel-USA TODAY Sports /

Especially if you receive a speedy, 32-year-old outfielder with a strictly average bat and good defense. Generally, players who rely on their speed as much as Dyson does tend to fall off a cliff when they reach his age and their speed declines. Dyson’s plate discipline and his base-stealing ability (which isn’t entirely due to his speed) could make him an exception to this rule. If Dipoto is right, and Dyson can perform as advertised at the plate, on the basepaths, and in the field, the Mariners wrested a valuable player with a cheap contract from Kansas City for a decent but unspectacular arm.

Next: Will C.J. Prosise Play Against Atlanta?

If he’s wrong, the Mariners traded for the next Chone Figgins. Let’s hope Dyson doesn’t forget how to protect the zone and steal bases in a Mariners uniform. If I had to make a prediction, I’d guess Dyson doesn’t forget and turns in a valuable season for the Mariners in 2017. But I’m a serial optimist. What are your thoughts?